Newpoint is a sham: Part 2
The Internet: The Ultimate BS Detector The internet has a long memory, which proves invaluable in an era where financial legitimacy is often shrouded...
2 min read
Mark Smith : September 10, 2024 11:17:43 AM AEST
Newpoint claims to be backed by Postd Inc.
Postd Inc claims to be backed by Wells Fargo NA. Wells Fargo Bank? No, Wells Fargo NA - a sham operation said to be run out of the Wells Fargo Museum address - but actually it should be Wells Fargo NE - non-existent. More later.
Estate Fr. Jose Antonio Diaz al. Severino Sta. Romana Trust registered its financing charge ref 1976904310 in California on 4 January 2019. The financing charge is available on our webpage here.
Postd Merchant Banque (lets just pretend its a real merchant bank for a minute) registered its financing charge 207770919002 in California on 1 April 2020* - over the assets of Estate Fr. Jose Antonio Diaz al. Severino Sta. Romana Trust.
* April fools day.
Assets? We don't need to speculate - the financing charge sets out what these are ... a copy of the financing statement is available here.
In short the assets Postd Merchant Banque (we're still pretending its a real merchant bank) originate under registered financing charge ref 1976904310, California on 4 January 2019. Moreover financing charge 207770919002 annexes what appear to be title documents - title to a mere $42bn of gold said to be on deposit with Wells Fargo non-existent. A copy of the financing charge is available to download from this page.
So the question is - how real is the $42bn in gold?
Answer. The title document is a forgery - and it would appear that Newpoint is (or ought to have been aware of this).
How do we know the document is a forgery?
Attached to the financing statement is a further 'certificate of title' of sorts.
The certificate of title appears to have been signed by amongst other, Harry S Truman (president of the USA) and Dwight Eisenhower (Allied Forces, Philippines). The certificate of title appears to have been signed on 11 August 1952 in the Malacanang Palace (Manilla). Ferdinand Marcos - former President of the Philippines is also an apparent signature to the document.
Some digging into the whereabouts of Harry S Truman (president of the USA) and Dwight Eisenhower (Allied Forces, Philippines) on 11 August 1952 is however problematic and exposes this document (which Newpoint have relied upon* and even put the fruits thereof on several of their balance sheets*) is a forgery. The ramifications on this for Credit Rating agencies like AM Best and fronting companies like PVI Insurance are not insignificant*.
* More on this to come.
Harry S Truman (president of the USA) and Dwight Eisenhower (Allied Forces, Philippines) on 11 August 1952 where NOT in Manilla, Philippines on the said day.
In case these diary notes are wrong - here is a newspaper article for 11 August 1952 noting:
On this basis, I say for part 1 of Newpoint is a Sham that to the extent that Newpoint relies in any way on the $42bn of gold - Newpoint is a Sham.
If you have any further tip-offs or information - submit these via our tip-off forms. All tip-offs investigated and can be treated confidentially and securely.
Please subscribe to our blog for further updates.
The Internet: The Ultimate BS Detector The internet has a long memory, which proves invaluable in an era where financial legitimacy is often shrouded...
Meet Richard Dvorak - the guy with a registered charge over $500m of Newpoint shares (Rhode Island tax fraudster, the man who would control Newpoint...
Newpoint received use of Trevor Saliba and Ian Fleming's $42bn treasury bond but pay $0 in interest over 20+ years. Sham?
Let's analyze the investment in a bond that was purchased on February 15, 2013, with a maturity date of February 15, 2043, considering the current...
In the course of investigating one of the dodgiest people I've come across, Steven Papermaster, I stumbled onto some research into probably a lovely...
1 min read
Imagine you have a magic piggy bank that can grow money over time. But, there's a catch: the money you put in today (or in 2013) won't be...
England and Wales High Court (Commercial Court): Summary (dated 17 July 2024)